vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 4.7%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 5.9%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $434.3M). Over the past eight quarters, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 10.5%).

Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.

EEFT vs ROP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ROP
ROP
1.9× larger
ROP
$2.1B
$1.1B
EEFT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ROP
ROP
+5.4% gap
ROP
11.3%
5.9%
EEFT
Higher net margin
ROP
ROP
11.1% more per $
ROP
15.8%
4.7%
EEFT
More free cash flow
ROP
ROP
$72.7M more FCF
ROP
$507.0M
$434.3M
EEFT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EEFT
EEFT
Annualised
EEFT
13.7%
10.5%
ROP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Revenue
$1.1B
$2.1B
Net Profit
$51.8M
$331.0M
Gross Margin
69.4%
Operating Margin
9.1%
27.2%
Net Margin
4.7%
15.8%
Revenue YoY
5.9%
11.3%
Net Profit YoY
14.3%
53.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.97
$4.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$915.5M
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$986.2M
$1.7B
Net Profit
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$331.0M
Q4 25
$51.8M
$428.4M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$97.6M
$378.3M
Q1 25
$38.4M
$331.1M
Q4 24
$45.3M
$462.3M
Q3 24
$151.5M
$367.9M
Q2 24
$83.1M
$337.1M
Gross Margin
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
69.4%
Q4 25
69.5%
Q3 25
69.5%
Q2 25
69.2%
Q1 25
68.7%
Q4 24
68.3%
Q3 24
69.2%
Q2 24
69.5%
Operating Margin
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
27.2%
Q4 25
9.1%
28.6%
Q3 25
17.0%
28.4%
Q2 25
14.8%
28.2%
Q1 25
8.2%
27.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
28.0%
Q3 24
16.6%
28.1%
Q2 24
13.6%
28.8%
Net Margin
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
15.8%
Q4 25
4.7%
20.8%
Q3 25
10.6%
19.8%
Q2 25
9.1%
19.5%
Q1 25
4.2%
17.6%
Q4 24
4.3%
24.6%
Q3 24
13.8%
20.8%
Q2 24
8.4%
19.6%
EPS (diluted)
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$4.87
Q4 25
$0.97
$3.97
Q3 25
$2.75
$3.68
Q2 25
$2.27
$3.49
Q1 25
$0.85
$3.06
Q4 24
$0.96
$4.29
Q3 24
$3.21
$3.40
Q2 24
$1.73
$3.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
$382.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.0B
$9.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$18.8B
Total Assets
$6.5B
$34.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.79×
0.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$382.9M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$297.4M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$320.0M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$242.4M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$372.8M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$188.2M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$269.6M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$251.5M
Total Debt
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$9.7B
Q4 25
$1.0B
$9.3B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$7.6B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Stockholders' Equity
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$18.8B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$19.9B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$20.0B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$19.6B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$19.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$18.9B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$18.5B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$18.1B
Total Assets
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$34.6B
Q4 25
$6.5B
$34.6B
Q3 25
$6.3B
$34.6B
Q2 25
$6.6B
$33.2B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$31.4B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$31.3B
Q3 24
$6.3B
$31.6B
Q2 24
$6.1B
$29.8B
Debt / Equity
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.52×
Q4 25
0.79×
0.47×
Q3 25
0.85×
Q2 25
0.74×
Q1 25
1.46×
Q4 24
0.92×
0.40×
Q3 24
0.88×
Q2 24
0.85×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$559.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$434.3M
$507.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
39.2%
24.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.3%
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
10.81×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$722.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$559.8M
$738.0M
Q3 25
$197.3M
$869.5M
Q2 25
$182.9M
$404.1M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$528.7M
Q4 24
$732.8M
$722.2M
Q3 24
$440.3M
$755.4M
Q2 24
$182.2M
$384.1M
Free Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$507.0M
Q4 25
$434.3M
Q3 25
$161.2M
Q2 25
$148.3M
Q1 25
$-21.5M
Q4 24
$615.6M
Q3 24
$414.5M
Q2 24
$148.8M
FCF Margin
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
24.2%
Q4 25
39.2%
Q3 25
14.1%
Q2 25
13.8%
Q1 25
-2.3%
Q4 24
58.8%
Q3 24
37.7%
Q2 24
15.1%
Capex Intensity
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.5%
Q4 25
11.3%
Q3 25
3.2%
Q2 25
3.2%
Q1 25
2.5%
Q4 24
11.2%
Q3 24
2.3%
Q2 24
3.4%
Cash Conversion
EEFT
EEFT
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.81×
1.72×
Q3 25
1.62×
2.18×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.07×
Q1 25
0.04×
1.60×
Q4 24
16.18×
1.56×
Q3 24
2.91×
2.05×
Q2 24
2.19×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons