vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.4× SCANSOURCE, INC.). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs 2.2%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 2.5%). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($434.3M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
EEFT vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $51.8M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.3% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.5M | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $986.2M | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $857.0M | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $51.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.5M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.75 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.27 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.21 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.73 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $559.8M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $434.3M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.2% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.81× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $722.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $559.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.3M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $434.3M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.2M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.6M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $414.5M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.81× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.18× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEFT
Segment breakdown not available.
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |