vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.7M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.5× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -22.8%, a 55.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LXP Industrial Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -0.3%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
EEX vs LXP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $86.7M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 34.6% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | 33.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | -14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $87.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $100.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $85.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.4M | $86.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $-269.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 82.4% |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $170.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.66× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $170.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $229.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $186.8M | $293.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-90.7M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $188.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $44.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $39.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $38.9M |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | 2.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
