vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.8× Ellington Financial Inc.).

Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.

Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.

EFC vs LANV — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LANV
LANV
1.8× larger
LANV
$144.1M
$78.2M
EFC

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Revenue
$78.2M
$144.1M
Net Profit
$22.6M
Gross Margin
53.9%
Operating Margin
7.4%
-60.5%
Net Margin
28.9%
Revenue YoY
8.7%
Net Profit YoY
-26.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.10

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$78.2M
Q3 25
$82.8M
Q2 25
$92.5M
$144.1M
Q1 25
$82.9M
Q4 24
$72.0M
Q3 24
$67.0M
Q2 24
$91.2M
$184.7M
Q1 24
$75.5M
Net Profit
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$22.6M
Q3 25
$29.5M
Q2 25
$42.9M
Q1 25
$31.6M
Q4 24
$30.7M
Q3 24
$16.2M
Q2 24
$52.3M
Q1 24
$26.9M
Gross Margin
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
53.9%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
57.5%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
7.4%
Q3 25
31.1%
Q2 25
38.3%
-60.5%
Q1 25
37.3%
Q4 24
28.0%
Q3 24
24.0%
Q2 24
52.8%
-35.0%
Q1 24
42.2%
Net Margin
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
28.9%
Q3 25
35.7%
Q2 25
46.4%
Q1 25
38.2%
Q4 24
42.6%
Q3 24
24.1%
Q2 24
57.4%
Q1 24
35.6%
EPS (diluted)
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$0.10
Q3 25
$0.29
Q2 25
$0.45
Q1 25
$0.35
Q4 24
$0.23
Q3 24
$0.19
Q2 24
$0.62
Q1 24
$0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$201.9M
$32.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$290.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$-116.4M
Total Assets
$19.4B
$632.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$201.9M
Q3 25
$184.8M
Q2 25
$211.0M
$32.1M
Q1 25
$203.3M
Q4 24
$192.4M
Q3 24
$217.7M
Q2 24
$198.5M
$19.3M
Q1 24
$187.5M
Total Debt
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$290.3M
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$136.4M
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$-116.4M
Q1 25
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$100.1M
Q1 24
$1.5B
Total Assets
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$19.4B
Q3 25
$17.8B
Q2 25
$17.1B
$632.1M
Q1 25
$16.6B
Q4 24
$16.3B
Q3 24
$16.0B
Q2 24
$15.1B
$731.8M
Q1 24
$15.1B
Debt / Equity
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
1.36×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-925.5M
$-75.1K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-40.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
$-925.5M
Q3 25
$-290.4M
Q2 25
$-210.5M
$-75.1K
Q1 25
$-126.4M
Q4 24
$-430.5M
Q3 24
$-141.7M
Q2 24
$-88.6M
$-36.2K
Q1 24
$-59.5M
Capex Intensity
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
0.0%
Cash Conversion
EFC
EFC
LANV
LANV
Q4 25
-40.92×
Q3 25
-9.84×
Q2 25
-4.90×
Q1 25
-3.99×
Q4 24
-14.04×
Q3 24
-8.76×
Q2 24
-1.69×
Q1 24
-2.21×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons