vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP (EFSC) and Gitlab Inc. (GTLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Gitlab Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($244.4M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.3× ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP). ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs -3.4%, a 30.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Gitlab Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 9.0%).

The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.

GitLab Inc. is an American company that operates and develops GitLab, an open-core DevOps software package that can develop, secure, and operate software. GitLab includes a distributed version control system based on Git, including features such as access control, bug tracking, software feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project, as well as snippets.

EFSC vs GTLB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GTLB
GTLB
1.3× larger
GTLB
$244.4M
$185.2M
EFSC
Higher net margin
EFSC
EFSC
30.0% more per $
EFSC
26.6%
-3.4%
GTLB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GTLB
GTLB
Annualised
GTLB
22.1%
9.0%
EFSC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Revenue
$185.2M
$244.4M
Net Profit
$49.4M
$-8.3M
Gross Margin
86.8%
Operating Margin
-5.1%
Net Margin
26.6%
-3.4%
Revenue YoY
24.6%
Net Profit YoY
-1.2%
-128.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.30
$-0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
$185.2M
Q4 25
$193.6M
$244.4M
Q3 25
$206.9M
$236.0M
Q2 25
$173.4M
$214.5M
Q1 25
$166.0M
$211.4M
Q4 24
$167.0M
$196.0M
Q3 24
$164.9M
$182.6M
Q2 24
$156.0M
$169.2M
Net Profit
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
$49.4M
Q4 25
$54.8M
$-8.3M
Q3 25
$45.2M
$-9.2M
Q2 25
$51.4M
$-35.9M
Q1 25
$50.0M
$5.8M
Q4 24
$48.8M
$29.6M
Q3 24
$50.6M
$12.9M
Q2 24
$45.4M
$-54.6M
Gross Margin
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
86.8%
Q3 25
87.9%
Q2 25
88.3%
Q1 25
89.2%
Q4 24
88.7%
Q3 24
88.3%
Q2 24
88.9%
Operating Margin
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
-5.1%
Q3 25
42.9%
-7.8%
Q2 25
37.0%
-16.1%
Q1 25
36.8%
-9.1%
Q4 24
-14.7%
Q3 24
38.1%
-22.5%
Q2 24
36.7%
-31.7%
Net Margin
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
26.6%
Q4 25
28.3%
-3.4%
Q3 25
21.9%
-3.9%
Q2 25
29.6%
-16.7%
Q1 25
30.1%
2.7%
Q4 24
29.2%
15.1%
Q3 24
30.7%
7.1%
Q2 24
29.1%
-32.3%
EPS (diluted)
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
$1.30
Q4 25
$1.45
$-0.05
Q3 25
$1.19
$-0.06
Q2 25
$1.36
$-0.22
Q1 25
$1.31
$0.05
Q4 24
$1.27
$0.18
Q3 24
$1.32
$0.08
Q2 24
$1.19
$-0.35

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$224.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1B
$922.7M
Total Assets
$17.3B
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$224.2M
Q3 25
$261.4M
Q2 25
$255.7M
Q1 25
$227.6M
Q4 24
$176.6M
Q3 24
$438.6M
Q2 24
$420.3M
Stockholders' Equity
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$922.7M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$866.6M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$808.3M
Q1 25
$1.9B
$775.9M
Q4 24
$1.8B
$724.7M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$642.8M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$567.8M
Total Assets
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
$17.3B
Q4 25
$17.3B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$16.4B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$16.1B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$15.7B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$15.6B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$15.0B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$14.6B
$1.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$28.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$242.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$193.5M
$31.4M
Q3 25
$49.4M
$49.4M
Q2 25
$61.3M
$106.3M
Q1 25
$40.0M
$63.2M
Q4 24
$247.4M
$-177.0M
Q3 24
$89.0M
$11.7M
Q2 24
$76.5M
$38.1M
Free Cash Flow
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$181.5M
$28.4M
Q3 25
$47.1M
$46.5M
Q2 25
$59.0M
$105.4M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$62.1M
Q4 24
$239.9M
$-178.1M
Q3 24
$88.2M
$10.8M
Q2 24
$74.7M
$37.4M
FCF Margin
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
93.8%
11.6%
Q3 25
22.8%
19.7%
Q2 25
34.0%
49.1%
Q1 25
21.5%
29.4%
Q4 24
143.7%
-90.8%
Q3 24
53.5%
5.9%
Q2 24
47.9%
22.1%
Capex Intensity
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.2%
1.2%
Q3 25
1.1%
1.2%
Q2 25
1.3%
0.4%
Q1 25
2.7%
0.5%
Q4 24
4.5%
0.5%
Q3 24
0.5%
0.5%
Q2 24
1.1%
0.4%
Cash Conversion
EFSC
EFSC
GTLB
GTLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.53×
Q3 25
1.09×
Q2 25
1.19×
Q1 25
0.80×
10.89×
Q4 24
5.07×
-5.99×
Q3 24
1.76×
0.90×
Q2 24
1.68×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EFSC
EFSC

Net Interest Income$166.1M90%
Noninterest Income$19.1M10%

GTLB
GTLB

Subscription And Circulation$146.4M60%
Subscription Software As A Service$76.9M31%
License$15.5M6%
Professional Services And Other$5.6M2%

Related Comparisons