vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP (EFSC) and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP (PRGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.7M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.4× ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP). ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs 10.2%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP's revenue compounded faster (17.0% CAGR vs 9.0%).

The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.

Progress Software Corporation develops and sells enterprise software products including application development platforms, data connectivity tools, and digital experience solutions. It serves global enterprise clients across finance, healthcare, manufacturing, retail and other sectors, helping organizations build scalable, high-performance business applications and streamline operational workflows.

EFSC vs PRGS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PRGS
PRGS
1.4× larger
PRGS
$252.7M
$185.2M
EFSC
Higher net margin
EFSC
EFSC
16.5% more per $
EFSC
26.6%
10.2%
PRGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRGS
PRGS
Annualised
PRGS
17.0%
9.0%
EFSC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Revenue
$185.2M
$252.7M
Net Profit
$49.4M
$25.7M
Gross Margin
81.6%
Operating Margin
15.2%
Net Margin
26.6%
10.2%
Revenue YoY
17.5%
Net Profit YoY
-1.2%
2144.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.30
$0.59

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
$185.2M
Q4 25
$193.6M
$252.7M
Q3 25
$206.9M
$249.8M
Q2 25
$173.4M
$237.4M
Q1 25
$166.0M
$238.0M
Q4 24
$167.0M
$215.0M
Q3 24
$164.9M
$178.7M
Q2 24
$156.0M
$175.1M
Net Profit
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
$49.4M
Q4 25
$54.8M
$25.7M
Q3 25
$45.2M
$19.4M
Q2 25
$51.4M
$17.0M
Q1 25
$50.0M
$10.9M
Q4 24
$48.8M
$1.1M
Q3 24
$50.6M
$28.5M
Q2 24
$45.4M
$16.2M
Gross Margin
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
81.6%
Q3 25
81.0%
Q2 25
80.1%
Q1 25
80.6%
Q4 24
83.0%
Q3 24
83.7%
Q2 24
81.7%
Operating Margin
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
15.2%
Q3 25
42.9%
17.6%
Q2 25
37.0%
16.3%
Q1 25
36.8%
13.6%
Q4 24
10.0%
Q3 24
38.1%
22.6%
Q2 24
36.7%
15.5%
Net Margin
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
26.6%
Q4 25
28.3%
10.2%
Q3 25
21.9%
7.8%
Q2 25
29.6%
7.2%
Q1 25
30.1%
4.6%
Q4 24
29.2%
0.5%
Q3 24
30.7%
15.9%
Q2 24
29.1%
9.2%
EPS (diluted)
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
$1.30
Q4 25
$1.45
$0.59
Q3 25
$1.19
$0.44
Q2 25
$1.36
$0.39
Q1 25
$1.31
$0.24
Q4 24
$1.27
$0.01
Q3 24
$1.32
$0.65
Q2 24
$1.19
$0.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$94.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1B
$478.3M
Total Assets
$17.3B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.93×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$94.8M
Q3 25
$99.0M
Q2 25
$102.0M
Q1 25
$124.2M
Q4 24
$118.1M
Q3 24
$232.7M
Q2 24
$190.4M
Total Debt
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.5B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$478.3M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$477.7M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$452.7M
Q1 25
$1.9B
$431.8M
Q4 24
$1.8B
$438.8M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$425.6M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$401.7M
Total Assets
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
$17.3B
Q4 25
$17.3B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$16.4B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$16.1B
$2.4B
Q1 25
$15.7B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$15.6B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$15.0B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$14.6B
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.93×
Q3 25
2.97×
Q2 25
3.22×
Q1 25
3.50×
Q4 24
3.48×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$62.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$59.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
23.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.44×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$229.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$193.5M
$62.8M
Q3 25
$49.4M
$73.4M
Q2 25
$61.3M
$30.0M
Q1 25
$40.0M
$68.9M
Q4 24
$247.4M
$19.7M
Q3 24
$89.0M
$57.7M
Q2 24
$76.5M
$63.7M
Free Cash Flow
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$181.5M
$59.9M
Q3 25
$47.1M
$72.4M
Q2 25
$59.0M
$29.5M
Q1 25
$35.6M
$67.7M
Q4 24
$239.9M
$16.8M
Q3 24
$88.2M
$56.6M
Q2 24
$74.7M
$62.7M
FCF Margin
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
93.8%
23.7%
Q3 25
22.8%
29.0%
Q2 25
34.0%
12.4%
Q1 25
21.5%
28.4%
Q4 24
143.7%
7.8%
Q3 24
53.5%
31.7%
Q2 24
47.9%
35.8%
Capex Intensity
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.2%
1.1%
Q3 25
1.1%
0.4%
Q2 25
1.3%
0.2%
Q1 25
2.7%
0.5%
Q4 24
4.5%
1.3%
Q3 24
0.5%
0.6%
Q2 24
1.1%
0.5%
Cash Conversion
EFSC
EFSC
PRGS
PRGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.53×
2.44×
Q3 25
1.09×
3.78×
Q2 25
1.19×
1.76×
Q1 25
0.80×
6.30×
Q4 24
5.07×
17.13×
Q3 24
1.76×
2.03×
Q2 24
1.68×
3.93×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EFSC
EFSC

Net Interest Income$166.1M90%
Noninterest Income$19.1M10%

PRGS
PRGS

Maintenanceand Services$187.5M74%
Share File Acquisition$67.5M27%

Related Comparisons