vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $270.4M, roughly 1.0× Enhabit, Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -14.3%, a 20.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 4.7%). Enhabit, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.3M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Enhabit, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.5% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Enhabit, Inc., is a Dallas, Texas-based provider of home health and hospice services. The company operates 255 home health and 110 hospice locations in 34 states with a concentration in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and Mississippi. Enhabit is the fourth-largest provider of home health services in the United States and is a leading provider of hospice services. The company was formed in 2022 when Encompass Health spun off its home health and hospice business.
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
EHAB vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.4M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $-38.7M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | -14.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.9% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.4M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.6M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.1M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.9M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.2M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.6M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.6M | $318.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.4M | $333.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-110.2M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-200.0K | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0K | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.6% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.92 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.20 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.6M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $426.0M | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.0M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.9M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.5M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $359.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.5M | $416.2M |
| Q4 25 | $426.0M | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.5M | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.9M | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $467.3M | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.6M | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.9M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $512.7M | $706.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $526.7M | $705.7M |
| Q4 25 | $534.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $566.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $523.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $566.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $674.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.3M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.78× | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.3M | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.8M | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.8M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $-59.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5M | $-59.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 86.50× | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EHAB
| Third Party Payor Medicare | $111.6M | 41% |
| Third Party Payor Medicare Advantage | $67.5M | 25% |
| Hospice Segment | $63.6M | 24% |
| Third Party Payor Managed Care | $24.9M | 9% |
| Third Party Payor Medicaid | $1.7M | 1% |
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
