vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and JFrog Ltd (FROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Employers Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($170.5M vs $145.3M, roughly 1.2× JFrog Ltd). On growth, JFrog Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs -21.3%). Over the past eight quarters, JFrog Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
EIG vs FROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $170.5M | $145.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-15.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -14.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.3% | 25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 34.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.5M | $145.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $127.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | $122.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.6M | $116.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $109.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $103.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-14.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | -15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.14 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.9M | $704.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $955.7M | $887.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.9M | $704.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.4M | $651.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $563.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $522.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.9M | $467.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $591.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.7M | $887.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $859.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $826.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $800.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $773.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $721.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $50.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $49.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 34.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $142.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | $49.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $48.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
