vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $170.5M, roughly 1.5× Employers Holdings, Inc.).
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
EIG vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $170.5M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.9M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $955.7M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIG
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
