vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $170.5M, roughly 1.3× Employers Holdings, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Employers Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered insurance holding company that specializes in offering workers' compensation insurance and customized risk management services primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises across the United States. It mainly serves clients in low-to-medium hazard industries, helping them mitigate workplace safety risks and meet relevant regulatory requirements for employee protection.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
EIG vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $170.5M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $170.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $188.5M | $223.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.3M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.6M | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.3M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $169.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $955.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $955.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.4M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 2.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
