vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edison International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.9× Mohawk Industries). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 4.3%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 8.0%). Mohawk Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.8M vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
EIX vs MHK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $117.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 8.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | 61.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $117.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $72.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $157.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $2.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $2.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $872.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $872.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $516.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $546.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $702.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | $497.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $7.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $13.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $110.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | $7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | 0.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | $709.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $459.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $386.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $233.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $310.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | $-85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $204.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $142.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 10.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
MHK
| Global Ceramic | $1.1B | 40% |
| Flooring NA | $880.0M | 32% |
| Flooring ROW | $751.3M | 28% |
