vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd (EJH) and Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.4M vs $16.5M, roughly 1.6× Finward Bancorp). Finward Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs -19.2%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Finward Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -0.0%).
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited is a China-based professional household services provider. It offers in-home services including home cleaning, childcare support, elder care, maternity care, and domestic worker placement, serving urban residential and small commercial clients across multiple Chinese regions.
Finward Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal and mortgage loans, small business financing, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual customers and small to mid-sized enterprises in its local operating regions.
EJH vs FNWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.4M | $16.5M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | 11.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.2% | 12.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.3% | -5.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $455.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $606.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.6% |
| Q4 25 | -19.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $173.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.9M | $174.7M |
| Total Assets | $278.1M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $173.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $265.9M | $174.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $154.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.1M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $148.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $151.6M |
| Q4 25 | $278.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 54.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $10.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-322.4K | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-25.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-736.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EJH
| Installation and maintenance | $16.9M | 64% |
| Housekeeping | $8.6M | 33% |
| Other | $857.6K | 3% |
FNWD
Segment breakdown not available.
