vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd (EJH) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.4M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.9× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -19.2%, a 56.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, E-Home Household Service Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.0% vs -1.5%).
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited is a China-based professional household services provider. It offers in-home services including home cleaning, childcare support, elder care, maternity care, and domestic worker placement, serving urban residential and small commercial clients across multiple Chinese regions.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
EJH vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.4M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -19.2% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.3% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 41.8% |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -49.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | -19.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -82.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-19.62 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-10.66 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $173.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.9M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $278.1M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $173.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $32.3M |
| Q4 25 | $265.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $148.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $278.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $164.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $42.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 8.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-322.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-950.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -31.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -70.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EJH
| Installation and maintenance | $16.9M | 64% |
| Housekeeping | $8.6M | 33% |
| Other | $857.6K | 3% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
