vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL) and Parker Hannifin (PH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Parker Hannifin is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.5× Estée Lauder Companies (The)). Parker Hannifin runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 3.8%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Parker Hannifin posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Parker Hannifin's revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs 3.6%).

Estée Lauder was an American businesswoman. She co-founded her eponymous cosmetics company with her husband, Joseph Lauter. Lauder was the only woman on Time magazine's 1998 list of the 20 most influential business geniuses of the 20th century.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

EL vs PH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PH
PH
1.5× larger
PH
$6.2B
$4.2B
EL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PH
PH
+5.0% gap
PH
10.6%
5.6%
EL
Higher net margin
PH
PH
10.8% more per $
PH
14.6%
3.8%
EL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PH
PH
Annualised
PH
9.1%
3.6%
EL

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
EL
EL
PH
PH
Revenue
$4.2B
$6.2B
Net Profit
$162.0M
$904.0M
Gross Margin
76.5%
43.8%
Operating Margin
9.5%
Net Margin
3.8%
14.6%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
10.6%
Net Profit YoY
127.5%
-5.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$7.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$6.2B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$5.2B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$5.1B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$5.0B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$4.7B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$4.9B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$5.2B
Net Profit
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$904.0M
Q4 25
$162.0M
Q3 25
$47.0M
Q2 25
$-546.0M
$923.6M
Q1 25
$159.0M
$961.2M
Q4 24
$-590.0M
$948.6M
Q3 24
$-156.0M
$698.5M
Q2 24
$-286.0M
$785.1M
Gross Margin
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
43.8%
Q4 25
76.5%
37.3%
Q3 25
73.4%
37.5%
Q2 25
72.0%
37.3%
Q1 25
75.0%
36.9%
Q4 24
76.1%
36.3%
Q3 24
72.4%
36.8%
Q2 24
71.8%
35.9%
Operating Margin
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.5%
22.8%
Q3 25
4.9%
23.3%
Q2 25
-11.4%
22.7%
Q1 25
8.6%
22.3%
Q4 24
-14.5%
20.9%
Q3 24
-3.6%
21.6%
Q2 24
-6.0%
21.1%
Net Margin
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
14.6%
Q4 25
3.8%
Q3 25
1.4%
Q2 25
-16.0%
17.6%
Q1 25
4.5%
19.4%
Q4 24
-14.7%
20.0%
Q3 24
-4.6%
14.2%
Q2 24
-7.4%
15.1%
EPS (diluted)
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$7.06
Q4 25
$0.44
$6.60
Q3 25
$0.13
$6.29
Q2 25
$-1.52
$7.16
Q1 25
$0.44
$7.37
Q4 24
$-1.64
$7.25
Q3 24
$-0.43
$5.34
Q2 24
$-0.79
$6.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EL
EL
PH
PH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$476.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.3B
$6.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.0B
$14.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$30.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.82×
0.46×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$476.0M
Q4 25
$427.0M
Q3 25
$473.0M
Q2 25
$467.0M
Q1 25
$408.7M
Q4 24
$395.5M
Q3 24
$371.1M
Q2 24
$422.0M
Total Debt
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$6.8B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$7.5B
Q3 25
$7.3B
$7.5B
Q2 25
$7.3B
$7.5B
Q1 25
$7.3B
$7.4B
Q4 24
$7.3B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$7.3B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$7.3B
$7.2B
Stockholders' Equity
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$14.6B
Q4 25
$4.0B
$14.3B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$13.8B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$13.7B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$13.4B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$13.1B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$12.9B
Q2 24
$5.3B
$12.1B
Total Assets
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$30.7B
Q4 25
$19.6B
$30.5B
Q3 25
$19.3B
$30.7B
Q2 25
$19.9B
$29.5B
Q1 25
$19.9B
$28.9B
Q4 24
$19.8B
$28.3B
Q3 24
$21.3B
$29.6B
Q2 24
$21.7B
$29.3B
Debt / Equity
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
0.46×
Q4 25
1.82×
0.52×
Q3 25
1.88×
0.54×
Q2 25
1.89×
0.55×
Q1 25
1.68×
0.55×
Q4 24
1.75×
0.51×
Q3 24
1.44×
0.52×
Q2 24
1.37×
0.59×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EL
EL
PH
PH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
$2.6B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.0B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.6%
4.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.94×
2.91×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$862.0M
Q3 25
$-340.0M
$782.0M
Q2 25
$601.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$284.0M
$630.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$934.8M
Q3 24
$-670.0M
$744.0M
Q2 24
$889.0M
$1.2B
Free Cash Flow
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.0B
$768.0M
Q3 25
$-436.0M
$693.0M
Q2 25
$394.0M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$162.0M
$542.4M
Q4 24
$925.0M
$813.6M
Q3 24
$-811.0M
$648.7M
Q2 24
$672.0M
$1.1B
FCF Margin
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
Q4 25
24.0%
14.8%
Q3 25
-12.5%
13.6%
Q2 25
11.6%
25.5%
Q1 25
4.6%
10.9%
Q4 24
23.1%
17.2%
Q3 24
-24.1%
13.2%
Q2 24
17.4%
21.6%
Capex Intensity
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
4.6%
Q4 25
2.6%
1.8%
Q3 25
2.8%
1.8%
Q2 25
6.1%
2.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
1.8%
Q4 24
3.3%
2.6%
Q3 24
4.2%
1.9%
Q2 24
5.6%
2.3%
Cash Conversion
EL
EL
PH
PH
Q1 26
2.91×
Q4 25
6.94×
Q3 25
-7.23×
Q2 25
1.59×
Q1 25
1.79×
0.66×
Q4 24
0.99×
Q3 24
1.07×
Q2 24
1.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EL
EL

Skin Care$2.1B49%
Makeup$1.2B28%
Fragrance$812.0M19%
Hair Care$168.0M4%
Other$31.0M1%

PH
PH

Diversified Industrial$3.7B60%
Aerospace Systems$1.8B29%
Other$685.0M11%

Related Comparisons