vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Estée Lauder Companies (The) (EL) and Universal Health Services (UHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Universal Health Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.1× Estée Lauder Companies (The)). Universal Health Services runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs 3.8%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Universal Health Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.2% vs 5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Universal Health Services's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs 3.6%).

Estée Lauder was an American businesswoman. She co-founded her eponymous cosmetics company with her husband, Joseph Lauter. Lauder was the only woman on Time magazine's 1998 list of the 20 most influential business geniuses of the 20th century.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.

EL vs UHS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UHS
UHS
1.1× larger
UHS
$4.5B
$4.2B
EL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UHS
UHS
+2.6% gap
UHS
8.2%
5.6%
EL
Higher net margin
UHS
UHS
4.1% more per $
UHS
8.0%
3.8%
EL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UHS
UHS
Annualised
UHS
7.3%
3.6%
EL

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Revenue
$4.2B
$4.5B
Net Profit
$162.0M
$358.7M
Gross Margin
76.5%
Operating Margin
9.5%
11.2%
Net Margin
3.8%
8.0%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
8.2%
Net Profit YoY
127.5%
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.44
$5.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$4.2B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$3.9B
Net Profit
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$358.7M
Q4 25
$162.0M
$445.9M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$373.0M
Q2 25
$-546.0M
$353.2M
Q1 25
$159.0M
$316.7M
Q4 24
$-590.0M
$332.4M
Q3 24
$-156.0M
$258.7M
Q2 24
$-286.0M
$289.2M
Gross Margin
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
76.5%
Q3 25
73.4%
Q2 25
72.0%
Q1 25
75.0%
Q4 24
76.1%
Q3 24
72.4%
Q2 24
71.8%
Operating Margin
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
11.2%
Q4 25
9.5%
11.5%
Q3 25
4.9%
11.6%
Q2 25
-11.4%
11.7%
Q1 25
8.6%
11.1%
Q4 24
-14.5%
11.5%
Q3 24
-3.6%
9.7%
Q2 24
-6.0%
11.2%
Net Margin
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
8.0%
Q4 25
3.8%
9.9%
Q3 25
1.4%
8.3%
Q2 25
-16.0%
8.2%
Q1 25
4.5%
7.7%
Q4 24
-14.7%
8.1%
Q3 24
-4.6%
6.5%
Q2 24
-7.4%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$5.65
Q4 25
$0.44
$7.01
Q3 25
$0.13
$5.86
Q2 25
$-1.52
$5.43
Q1 25
$0.44
$4.80
Q4 24
$-1.64
$4.94
Q3 24
$-0.43
$3.80
Q2 24
$-0.79
$4.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$119.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.3B
$4.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.0B
$7.5B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$15.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.82×
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$119.0M
Q4 25
$137.8M
Q3 25
$112.9M
Q2 25
$137.6M
Q1 25
$126.8M
Q4 24
$126.0M
Q3 24
$106.1M
Q2 24
$128.8M
Total Debt
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$4.8B
Q3 25
$7.3B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$7.3B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$7.3B
$4.6B
Q4 24
$7.3B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$7.3B
$4.7B
Q2 24
$7.3B
$4.5B
Stockholders' Equity
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$7.5B
Q4 25
$4.0B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$3.9B
$7.0B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$6.8B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$6.6B
Q2 24
$5.3B
$6.5B
Total Assets
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$15.7B
Q4 25
$19.6B
$15.5B
Q3 25
$19.3B
$15.3B
Q2 25
$19.9B
$15.0B
Q1 25
$19.9B
$14.9B
Q4 24
$19.8B
$14.5B
Q3 24
$21.3B
$14.4B
Q2 24
$21.7B
$14.1B
Debt / Equity
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
0.63×
Q4 25
1.82×
0.65×
Q3 25
1.88×
0.66×
Q2 25
1.89×
0.65×
Q1 25
1.68×
0.68×
Q4 24
1.75×
0.68×
Q3 24
1.44×
0.71×
Q2 24
1.37×
0.69×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
$401.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.0B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.6%
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.94×
1.12×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
$401.6M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$574.7M
Q3 25
$-340.0M
$380.7M
Q2 25
$601.0M
$549.0M
Q1 25
$284.0M
$360.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$658.4M
Q3 24
$-670.0M
$333.0M
Q2 24
$889.0M
$679.3M
Free Cash Flow
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.0B
$293.5M
Q3 25
$-436.0M
$151.8M
Q2 25
$394.0M
$283.0M
Q1 25
$162.0M
$121.0M
Q4 24
$925.0M
$412.5M
Q3 24
$-811.0M
$85.0M
Q2 24
$672.0M
$437.9M
FCF Margin
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
Q4 25
24.0%
6.5%
Q3 25
-12.5%
3.4%
Q2 25
11.6%
6.6%
Q1 25
4.6%
3.0%
Q4 24
23.1%
10.0%
Q3 24
-24.1%
2.1%
Q2 24
17.4%
11.2%
Capex Intensity
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
4.8%
Q4 25
2.6%
6.3%
Q3 25
2.8%
5.1%
Q2 25
6.1%
6.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
5.8%
Q4 24
3.3%
6.0%
Q3 24
4.2%
6.3%
Q2 24
5.6%
6.2%
Cash Conversion
EL
EL
UHS
UHS
Q1 26
1.12×
Q4 25
6.94×
1.29×
Q3 25
-7.23×
1.02×
Q2 25
1.55×
Q1 25
1.79×
1.14×
Q4 24
1.98×
Q3 24
1.29×
Q2 24
2.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EL
EL

Skin Care$2.1B49%
Makeup$1.2B28%
Fragrance$812.0M19%
Hair Care$168.0M4%
Other$31.0M1%

UHS
UHS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons