vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Envela Corp (ELA) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Hut 8 Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.5M vs $80.5M, roughly 1.1× Envela Corp). Envela Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -316.0%, a 323.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hut 8 Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (179.2% vs 66.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Envela Corp's revenue compounded faster (42.1% CAGR vs 30.8%).

Envela Corporation is a U.S.-based company that provides recommerce services aimed at extending product lifecycles and reducing resource consumption. The company operates through two primary segments: consumer and commercial.

Tropical Hut is a Filipino chain of fast food restaurants owned by Mercury Group of Companies, Inc. It is the 7th oldest food chain in the Philippines and older than Jollibee (1978) and McDonald's Philippines (1981).

ELA vs HUT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HUT
HUT
1.1× larger
HUT
$88.5M
$80.5M
ELA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HUT
HUT
+112.6% gap
HUT
179.2%
66.6%
ELA
Higher net margin
ELA
ELA
323.5% more per $
ELA
7.4%
-316.0%
HUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ELA
ELA
Annualised
ELA
42.1%
30.8%
HUT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Revenue
$80.5M
$88.5M
Net Profit
$6.0M
$-279.7M
Gross Margin
20.5%
60.4%
Operating Margin
9.4%
-491.4%
Net Margin
7.4%
-316.0%
Revenue YoY
66.6%
179.2%
Net Profit YoY
274.6%
-283.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.22
$-2.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$80.5M
$88.5M
Q3 25
$57.4M
$83.5M
Q2 25
$54.9M
$41.3M
Q1 25
$48.3M
$21.8M
Q4 24
$48.3M
$31.7M
Q3 24
$46.9M
$43.7M
Q2 24
$45.3M
$35.2M
Q1 24
$39.9M
$51.7M
Net Profit
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$6.0M
$-279.7M
Q3 25
$3.4M
$50.1M
Q2 25
$2.8M
$137.3M
Q1 25
$2.5M
$-133.9M
Q4 24
$1.6M
$152.2M
Q3 24
$1.7M
$647.0K
Q2 24
$1.6M
$-71.9M
Q1 24
$1.9M
$250.9M
Gross Margin
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
20.5%
60.4%
Q3 25
22.8%
61.3%
Q2 25
22.6%
47.3%
Q1 25
24.8%
14.5%
Q4 24
23.1%
35.9%
Q3 24
24.4%
59.9%
Q2 24
25.1%
41.4%
Q1 24
25.9%
45.6%
Operating Margin
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
9.4%
-491.4%
Q3 25
7.3%
87.0%
Q2 25
5.9%
Q1 25
6.5%
-676.8%
Q4 24
3.9%
Q3 24
4.3%
-3.6%
Q2 24
4.2%
-246.2%
Q1 24
5.9%
Net Margin
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
7.4%
-316.0%
Q3 25
5.8%
60.0%
Q2 25
5.0%
332.5%
Q1 25
5.2%
-613.7%
Q4 24
3.3%
480.3%
Q3 24
3.6%
1.5%
Q2 24
3.5%
-204.1%
Q1 24
4.8%
484.9%
EPS (diluted)
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$0.22
$-2.45
Q3 25
$0.13
$0.43
Q2 25
$0.11
$1.18
Q1 25
$0.10
$-1.30
Q4 24
$0.07
$1.41
Q3 24
$0.06
$0.01
Q2 24
$0.06
$-0.78
Q1 24
$0.07
$2.76

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$67.1M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$96.0M
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$44.9M
Q3 25
$33.5M
Q2 25
$216.3M
Q1 25
$108.4M
Q4 24
$85.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$19.8M
$11.5M
Total Debt
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$9.9M
Q3 25
$12.5M
Q2 25
$13.0M
Q1 25
$13.2M
Q4 24
$13.5M
$300.6M
Q3 24
$13.8M
$297.3M
Q2 24
$14.3M
$328.8M
Q1 24
$14.6M
$177.6M
Stockholders' Equity
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$67.1M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$61.1M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$57.8M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$55.1M
$960.0M
Q4 24
$52.7M
$976.7M
Q3 24
$51.1M
$703.9M
Q2 24
$50.2M
$660.1M
Q1 24
$49.3M
$732.0M
Total Assets
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$96.0M
$2.8B
Q3 25
$90.9M
$2.7B
Q2 25
$82.7M
$2.0B
Q1 25
$79.7M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$77.9M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$77.4M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$73.8M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$74.7M
$999.0M
Debt / Equity
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
0.15×
Q3 25
0.20×
Q2 25
0.23×
Q1 25
0.24×
Q4 24
0.26×
0.31×
Q3 24
0.27×
0.42×
Q2 24
0.29×
0.50×
Q1 24
0.30×
0.24×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-3.5M
$-139.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-3.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-4.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.59×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$-3.5M
$-139.2M
Q3 25
$2.4M
$770.0K
Q2 25
$2.6M
$-48.8M
Q1 25
$1.1M
$-33.8M
Q4 24
$3.7M
$-68.5M
Q3 24
$3.4M
$-4.2M
Q2 24
$-789.5K
$-16.4M
Q1 24
$3.8M
$-26.3M
Free Cash Flow
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
$-3.7M
Q3 25
$2.2M
Q2 25
$2.1M
Q1 25
$746.6K
Q4 24
$3.2M
Q3 24
$1.5M
Q2 24
$-1.3M
Q1 24
$3.3M
FCF Margin
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
-4.6%
Q3 25
3.8%
Q2 25
3.9%
Q1 25
1.5%
Q4 24
6.7%
Q3 24
3.1%
Q2 24
-2.9%
Q1 24
8.4%
Capex Intensity
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
0.2%
Q3 25
0.4%
Q2 25
0.8%
Q1 25
0.8%
Q4 24
1.0%
Q3 24
4.2%
Q2 24
1.1%
Q1 24
1.1%
Cash Conversion
ELA
ELA
HUT
HUT
Q4 25
-0.59×
Q3 25
0.72×
0.02×
Q2 25
0.94×
-0.36×
Q1 25
0.45×
Q4 24
2.34×
-0.45×
Q3 24
2.05×
-6.49×
Q2 24
-0.50×
Q1 24
1.99×
-0.11×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ELA
ELA

Consumer Segment$67.7M84%
Commercial Segment$12.8M16%

HUT
HUT

High Performance Computing Colocation And Cloud$81.9M93%
Power$5.0M6%
Digital Infrastructure$1.6M2%

Related Comparisons