vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Electromed, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.9M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.3× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 14.6%, a 22.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Electromed, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs -1.5%). Electromed, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-3.6M).
Electromed, Inc. is a specialized medical device firm developing, manufacturing, and distributing advanced respiratory care products. Its core offerings are high-frequency chest wall oscillation systems that clear airway secretions for patients with cystic fibrosis, COPD and other respiratory conditions, serving U.S. home care and clinical customers.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
ELMD vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.9M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.3% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.3% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.3% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 78.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 78.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.2% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.8M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $45.4M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $54.9M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $45.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.8M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.2M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.7% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.10× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.9M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-83.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.90× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELMD
| Homecare | $17.3M | 91% |
| Other | $1.6M | 9% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
