vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.6× Elme Communities). Latham Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -198.9%, a 191.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 1.7%). Latham Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.1M vs $7.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Elme Communities's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
ELME vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
