vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $4.6B, roughly 1.1× EMCOR Group, Inc.). Freeport-McMoRan runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 6.6%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EMCOR Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.7% vs -10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, EMCOR Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.3% CAGR vs -7.9%).
EMCOR Group, Inc., is an engineering, construction, and property management company headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut.
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
EME vs FCX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.6B | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $305.5M | $565.0M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.7% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.9% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.84 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | $305.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.6M | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $295.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.7M | $793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $292.2M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.6M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 32.0% |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | $6.84 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.64 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.57 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.72 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.26 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.80 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.25 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $916.4M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.9B | $18.9B |
| Total Assets | $9.5B | $58.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $916.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.1M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $486.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $807.3M | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4B |
| Q1 26 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $17.4B |
| Q1 26 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $58.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $56.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $56.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $55.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $54.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $558.0K | $693.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-312.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 19.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.00× | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $558.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $524.4M | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $492.5M | $-312.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.8M | $608.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.6M | $934.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.3M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $451.8M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $508.7M | $673.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.4M | $840.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.21× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.61× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.45× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.61× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.95× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EME
Segment breakdown not available.
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
