vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.3× Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -5.0%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services owned by Verizon. It was previously known as Citizens Utilities Co., Citizens Communications Co., and Frontier Communications Corp.
EMN vs FYBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $-76.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 7.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $-76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $-123.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $-82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-123.0M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 64.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 65.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 65.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 64.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 64.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | -7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -8.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $-0.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $336.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $4.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $412.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $506.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $750.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $21.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $21.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $20.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $20.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $20.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $504.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-315.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 53.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $477.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $519.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $374.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $-368.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $-238.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $-498.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $-81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $-252.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | -20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 53.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 42.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
FYBR
| Consumer | $826.0M | 54% |
| Business And Wholesale | $707.0M | 46% |
