vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 5.0%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHART INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
EMN vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
