vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.5× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 3.4%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
CELH vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
