vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.5× Eastman Chemical Company). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 0.0%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (352.8% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
EMN vs LSAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $437.0K |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $178.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $176.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $153.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | $437.0K | ||
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $-4.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 22.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | -0.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | -3.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.7M |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $216.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $200.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $180.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $184.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $704.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $649.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $640.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $551.9M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
