vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP (ORI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.2× Eastman Chemical Company). OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.8% vs 5.3%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -8.6%).

Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.

Old Republic International Corporation is an American property insurance and title insurance company. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

EMN vs ORI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ORI
ORI
1.2× larger
ORI
$2.4B
$2.0B
EMN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ORI
ORI
+20.6% gap
ORI
6.7%
-13.8%
EMN
Higher net margin
ORI
ORI
8.4% more per $
ORI
13.8%
5.3%
EMN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ORI
ORI
Annualised
ORI
13.2%
-8.6%
EMN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Revenue
$2.0B
$2.4B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$330.0M
Gross Margin
17.1%
Operating Margin
Net Margin
5.3%
13.8%
Revenue YoY
-13.8%
6.7%
Net Profit YoY
-42.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.93

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$2.0B
$2.4B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$1.9B
Net Profit
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$105.0M
$330.0M
Q4 25
$105.0M
$206.5M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$279.5M
Q2 25
$140.0M
$204.4M
Q1 25
$182.0M
$245.0M
Q4 24
$330.0M
$105.3M
Q3 24
$180.0M
$338.9M
Q2 24
$230.0M
$91.8M
Gross Margin
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
17.1%
Q4 25
17.1%
Q3 25
19.7%
Q2 25
22.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
24.7%
Q3 24
24.6%
Q2 24
25.3%
Operating Margin
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.6%
Q3 25
6.1%
14.6%
Q2 25
7.4%
11.8%
Q1 25
11.0%
14.6%
Q4 24
13.2%
Q3 24
11.4%
18.2%
Q2 24
12.1%
6.1%
Net Margin
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
5.3%
13.8%
Q4 25
5.3%
8.6%
Q3 25
2.1%
11.5%
Q2 25
6.1%
9.3%
Q1 25
7.9%
11.6%
Q4 24
14.7%
5.3%
Q3 24
7.3%
14.5%
Q2 24
9.7%
4.9%
EPS (diluted)
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$0.93
Q4 25
$0.93
$0.82
Q3 25
$0.40
$1.11
Q2 25
$1.20
$0.81
Q1 25
$1.57
$0.98
Q4 24
$2.81
$0.42
Q3 24
$1.53
$1.32
Q2 24
$1.94
$0.35

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$566.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.0B
$5.9M
Total Assets
$14.9B
$29.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$566.0M
Q4 25
$566.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$837.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$6.0B
$5.9M
Q4 25
$6.0B
$5.9B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$6.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$6.2B
Q1 25
$5.9B
$5.9B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$5.6B
Q3 24
$5.7B
$6.4B
Q2 24
$5.6B
$6.0B
Total Assets
EMN
EMN
ORI
ORI
Q1 26
$14.9B
$29.6M
Q4 25
$14.9B
$29.9B
Q3 25
$15.0B
$30.3B
Q2 25
$15.2B
$29.3B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$28.0B
Q4 24
$15.2B
$27.8B
Q3 24
$15.1B
$28.8B
Q2 24
$14.9B
$27.5B

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EMN
EMN

Segment breakdown not available.

ORI
ORI

operating$2.2B92%
net investment gains$201.8M8%

Related Comparisons