vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Rockwell Automation (ROK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rockwell Automation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× Eastman Chemical Company). Rockwell Automation runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs 5.3%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Rockwell Automation's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
EMN vs ROK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $305.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 65.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $2.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $305.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $295.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $239.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $232.0M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 38.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $2.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $2.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $2.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $444.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $444.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $495.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $471.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $407.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $11.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $234.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $170.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $454.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $527.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $364.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $432.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $279.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $171.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $238.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
