vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and SMITHFIELD FOODS INC (SFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SMITHFIELD FOODS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.9× Eastman Chemical Company). SMITHFIELD FOODS INC runs the higher net margin — 6.6% vs 5.3%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SMITHFIELD FOODS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SMITHFIELD FOODS INC's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Smithfield Foods, Inc., is a Hong Kong-owned pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In addition to owning over 500 farms in the US, Smithfield contracts with another 2,000 independent farms around the country to raise Smithfield's pigs. Outside the US, the company has facilities in Mexico, Poland, Romania, Germany, S...
EMN vs SFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $249.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 9.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | $249.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $188.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $301.0M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $0.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $12.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
