vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.3× Eastman Chemical Company). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 5.3%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
EMN vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
