vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enphase Energy (ENPH) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enphase Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($282.9M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.0× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -2.6%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -20.6%). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Enphase Energy, Inc. is an American energy technology company headquartered in Fremont, California, that develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Enphase was established in 2006 and is the first company to successfully commercialize solar micro-inverters, which convert the direct current (DC) power generated by solar panels into grid-compatible alternating current (AC) for use or export.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
ENPH vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.9M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -2.6% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.6% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -124.9% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $282.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $343.3M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $410.4M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.2M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.1M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.7M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $380.9M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $280.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.6M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.8M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $54.5M |
| Q1 26 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 54.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.5M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $497.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $835.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $995.0M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $880.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $810.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $884.5M | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $11.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.9M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.6M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.3M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.1M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.1M | $88.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.8M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.4M | $69.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.6% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.69× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.73× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
