vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enphase Energy (ENPH) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enphase Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($282.9M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.3× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -2.6%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -20.6%). Enphase Energy produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.0M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Enphase Energy, Inc. is an American energy technology company headquartered in Fremont, California, that develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Enphase was established in 2006 and is the first company to successfully commercialize solar micro-inverters, which convert the direct current (DC) power generated by solar panels into grid-compatible alternating current (AC) for use or export.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
ENPH vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.9M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.4M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 54.0% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.6% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.6% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -124.9% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $282.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $343.3M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $410.4M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.2M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.7M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $380.9M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.8M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 54.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | -2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.5M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $497.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $995.0M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $880.6M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $810.7M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.0M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.4M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $884.5M | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.11× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.37× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.48× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.9M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.0M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.3% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.1M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.1M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.1M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.4M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.69× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.73× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENPH
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
