vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (HCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($778.9M vs $458.6M, roughly 1.7× WARRIOR MET COAL, INC.). WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -0.4%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.1% vs 6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 7.5%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (ticker HCC) is a U.S.-headquartered mining enterprise that produces and distributes high-grade metallurgical coal, a key raw material for steel production. It serves steel manufacturers and industrial clients across core markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
ENR vs HCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $458.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $72.3M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 17.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 52.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $458.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $328.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $299.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $297.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $327.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $396.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $41.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $70.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 17.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $233.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $154.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $336.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $383.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $454.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $491.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $583.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $709.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $154.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $154.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $153.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $153.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $153.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $147.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 6.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 47.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
HCC
| Sales | $448.5M | 98% |
| Other revenues | $10.1M | 2% |
