vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($778.9M vs $394.6M, roughly 2.0× Zeta Global Holdings Corp.). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -0.4%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs 6.5%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.2M vs $60.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
ENR vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
ZETA
Segment breakdown not available.
