vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and F5, Inc. (FFIV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $811.7M, roughly 1.1× F5, Inc.). F5, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 9.8%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F5, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, F5, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
F5, Inc. is an American technology company specializing in application security, multi-cloud management, online fraud prevention, application delivery networking (ADN), application availability and performance, and network security, access, and authorization.
ENS vs FFIV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $811.7M |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $148.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 22.1% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | 1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $2.58 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $811.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $822.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $810.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $780.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $731.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $746.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $695.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $148.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $180.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $190.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $189.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $145.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $166.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $165.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $144.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 81.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 82.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 81.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 80.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.58 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $3.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $3.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $3.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $2.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $2.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $2.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $935.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $525.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $525.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $202.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $159.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $149.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $191.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $273.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $246.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $194.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $240.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $153.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 1.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
FFIV
Segment breakdown not available.
