vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.6× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 9.8%, a 20.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 0.5%).

EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

ENS vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ENS
ENS
1.6× larger
ENS
$919.1M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+2.6% gap
KIM
4.0%
1.4%
ENS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
20.0% more per $
KIM
29.8%
9.8%
ENS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
0.5%
ENS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$919.1M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$90.4M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
30.1%
Operating Margin
13.5%
37.2%
Net Margin
9.8%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
1.4%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-21.3%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$2.40
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$919.1M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$951.3M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$893.0M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$974.8M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$906.2M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$883.7M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$852.9M
$500.2M
Net Profit
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$90.4M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$68.4M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$57.5M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$96.5M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$114.8M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$82.3M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$70.1M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
30.1%
Q3 25
29.1%
Q2 25
28.4%
Q1 25
31.2%
Q4 24
32.9%
Q3 24
28.5%
Q2 24
27.9%
Operating Margin
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
13.5%
36.4%
Q3 25
9.7%
34.9%
Q2 25
9.7%
39.2%
Q1 25
13.5%
33.6%
Q4 24
15.7%
31.7%
Q3 24
11.2%
33.7%
Q2 24
10.7%
32.1%
Net Margin
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
9.8%
27.9%
Q3 25
7.2%
25.7%
Q2 25
6.4%
31.0%
Q1 25
9.9%
24.8%
Q4 24
12.7%
31.6%
Q3 24
9.3%
26.8%
Q2 24
8.2%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$2.40
Q3 25
$1.80
Q2 25
$1.46
Q1 25
$2.39
Q4 24
$2.88
Q3 24
$2.01
Q2 24
$1.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$450.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$4.0B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$450.1M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$388.6M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$346.7M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$343.1M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$463.2M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$407.9M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$344.1M
$126.4M
Total Debt
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$1.9B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$10.6B
Total Assets
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$4.0B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.6B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.57×
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$184.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$171.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.04×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$441.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$184.6M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$218.0M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$968.0K
$305.4M
Q1 25
$135.2M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$81.1M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$33.6M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$10.4M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$171.3M
Q3 25
$197.1M
Q2 25
$-32.1M
Q1 25
$104.9M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$56.8M
Q3 24
$3.3M
Q2 24
$-25.7M
FCF Margin
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
18.6%
Q3 25
20.7%
Q2 25
-3.6%
Q1 25
10.8%
38.3%
Q4 24
6.3%
Q3 24
0.4%
Q2 24
-3.0%
Capex Intensity
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.4%
0.0%
Q3 25
2.2%
0.0%
Q2 25
3.7%
0.0%
Q1 25
3.1%
3.4%
Q4 24
2.7%
Q3 24
3.4%
Q2 24
4.2%
Cash Conversion
ENS
ENS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.04×
1.71×
Q3 25
3.19×
2.41×
Q2 25
0.02×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.40×
1.69×
Q4 24
0.71×
1.44×
Q3 24
0.41×
2.18×
Q2 24
0.15×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ENS
ENS

Energy Systems$399.5M43%
Motive Power$352.0M38%
Services$92.6M10%
Transferred Over Time$38.2M4%
Other$36.8M4%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons