vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and KEMPER Corp (KMPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KEMPER Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.2× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs -0.7%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EnerSys posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs -4.7%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $166.2M). Over the past eight quarters, EnerSys's revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs -0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Kemper Corporation is an American insurance provider with corporate headquarters located in Chicago, Illinois. With nearly $13 billion in assets, the Kemper family of companies provides insurance to individuals, families, and businesses.
ENS vs KMPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $-8.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | -108.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $73.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $71.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $1.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $943.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $371.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $407.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $545.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $696.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $539.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | $520.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $943.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $942.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $942.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $370.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $366.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $358.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $12.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $12.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 2.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $175.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $166.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | 14.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $553.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $175.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $139.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $180.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $175.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $141.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $166.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $133.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $172.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $165.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 1.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
KMPR
| Specialty Property Casualty Insurance Segment | $995.1M | 88% |
| Life Insurance Segment1 | $140.7M | 12% |
