vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERCURY GENERAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.7× EnerSys). MERCURY GENERAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 9.8%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERCURY GENERAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, MERCURY GENERAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
ENS vs MCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $190.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $190.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $202.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $-108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $62.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 99.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 99.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $3.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $5.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $-1.96 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $4.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $9.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $7.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $287.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $371.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $318.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $278.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $357.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $-81.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $266.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 4.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
MCY
Segment breakdown not available.
