vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and RIO TINTO PLC (RIO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RIO TINTO PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8B vs $919.1M, roughly 33.5× EnerSys). RIO TINTO PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs 9.8%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RIO TINTO PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.6% vs 1.4%). RIO TINTO PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3B vs $171.3M).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Rio Tinto Group is a British-Australian multinational mining company headquartered in London, England, and Melbourne, Australia. It was founded in 1873 when a group of British investors purchased a mine complex on the Río Tinto, in Huelva, Spain, from the Spanish government. It has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions and is today a major producer of commodities such as copper, iron ore, aluminium and lithium.
ENS vs RIO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $30.8B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $5.7B |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $30.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $26.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $9.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $21.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $67.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $128.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $67.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $58.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $128.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $102.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $2.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 24.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $11.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
RIO
Segment breakdown not available.
