vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Atlassian Corp (TEAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Atlassian Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.9× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs -5.5%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atlassian Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.7% vs 1.4%). Atlassian Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($561.3M vs $171.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Atlassian Corp's revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs 0.5%).

EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.

The Dragoneer Investment Group (Dragoneer) is an American investment firm based in San Francisco, California. The firm focuses on technology investments in both public and private markets globally.

ENS vs TEAM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TEAM
TEAM
1.9× larger
TEAM
$1.8B
$919.1M
ENS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TEAM
TEAM
+30.3% gap
TEAM
31.7%
1.4%
ENS
Higher net margin
ENS
ENS
15.3% more per $
ENS
9.8%
-5.5%
TEAM
More free cash flow
TEAM
TEAM
$390.0M more FCF
TEAM
$561.3M
$171.3M
ENS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TEAM
TEAM
Annualised
TEAM
22.6%
0.5%
ENS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Revenue
$919.1M
$1.8B
Net Profit
$90.4M
$-98.4M
Gross Margin
30.1%
85.3%
Operating Margin
13.5%
11.6%
Net Margin
9.8%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
1.4%
31.7%
Net Profit YoY
-21.3%
-39.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.40
$-0.38

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$1.8B
Q4 25
$919.1M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$951.3M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$893.0M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$974.8M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$906.2M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$883.7M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$852.9M
Net Profit
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$-98.4M
Q4 25
$90.4M
$-42.6M
Q3 25
$68.4M
$-51.9M
Q2 25
$57.5M
$-23.9M
Q1 25
$96.5M
$-70.8M
Q4 24
$114.8M
$-38.2M
Q3 24
$82.3M
$-123.8M
Q2 24
$70.1M
Gross Margin
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
85.3%
Q4 25
30.1%
85.0%
Q3 25
29.1%
82.0%
Q2 25
28.4%
83.1%
Q1 25
31.2%
83.8%
Q4 24
32.9%
82.7%
Q3 24
28.5%
81.7%
Q2 24
27.9%
Operating Margin
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
11.6%
Q4 25
13.5%
-3.0%
Q3 25
9.7%
-6.7%
Q2 25
9.7%
-2.1%
Q1 25
13.5%
-0.9%
Q4 24
15.7%
-4.5%
Q3 24
11.2%
-2.7%
Q2 24
10.7%
Net Margin
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
-5.5%
Q4 25
9.8%
-2.7%
Q3 25
7.2%
-3.6%
Q2 25
6.4%
-1.7%
Q1 25
9.9%
-5.2%
Q4 24
12.7%
-3.0%
Q3 24
9.3%
-10.4%
Q2 24
8.2%
EPS (diluted)
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$-0.38
Q4 25
$2.40
$-0.16
Q3 25
$1.80
$-0.20
Q2 25
$1.46
$-0.08
Q1 25
$2.39
$-0.27
Q4 24
$2.88
$-0.15
Q3 24
$2.01
$-0.48
Q2 24
$1.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$450.1M
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$989.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9B
$879.0M
Total Assets
$4.0B
$5.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$450.1M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$388.6M
$2.8B
Q2 25
$346.7M
$2.9B
Q1 25
$343.1M
$3.0B
Q4 24
$463.2M
$2.5B
Q3 24
$407.9M
$2.2B
Q2 24
$344.1M
Total Debt
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$989.1M
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$879.0M
Q4 25
$1.9B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.8B
Total Assets
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$5.7B
Q4 25
$4.0B
$6.2B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$6.0B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$5.9B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$5.4B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$3.6B
Debt / Equity
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
1.13×
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.57×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$184.6M
$567.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$171.3M
$561.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.6%
31.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
0.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.04×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$441.3M
$1.2B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$567.5M
Q4 25
$184.6M
$177.8M
Q3 25
$218.0M
$128.7M
Q2 25
$968.0K
$375.3M
Q1 25
$135.2M
$652.7M
Q4 24
$81.1M
$351.9M
Q3 24
$33.6M
$80.5M
Q2 24
$10.4M
Free Cash Flow
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
$561.3M
Q4 25
$171.3M
$168.5M
Q3 25
$197.1M
$114.6M
Q2 25
$-32.1M
$360.3M
Q1 25
$104.9M
$638.3M
Q4 24
$56.8M
$342.6M
Q3 24
$3.3M
$74.3M
Q2 24
$-25.7M
FCF Margin
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
31.4%
Q4 25
18.6%
10.6%
Q3 25
20.7%
8.0%
Q2 25
-3.6%
26.0%
Q1 25
10.8%
47.0%
Q4 24
6.3%
26.6%
Q3 24
0.4%
6.3%
Q2 24
-3.0%
Capex Intensity
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
1.4%
0.6%
Q3 25
2.2%
1.0%
Q2 25
3.7%
1.1%
Q1 25
3.1%
1.1%
Q4 24
2.7%
0.7%
Q3 24
3.4%
0.5%
Q2 24
4.2%
Cash Conversion
ENS
ENS
TEAM
TEAM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.04×
Q3 25
3.19×
Q2 25
0.02×
Q1 25
1.40×
Q4 24
0.71×
Q3 24
0.41×
Q2 24
0.15×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ENS
ENS

Energy Systems$399.5M43%
Motive Power$352.0M38%
Services$92.6M10%
Transferred Over Time$38.2M4%
Other$36.8M4%

TEAM
TEAM

Cloud$1.1B63%
Data Center$560.7M31%
Marketplace and other (1)$93.8M5%

Related Comparisons