vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ENTA) and Rumble Inc. (RUM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rumble Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.1M vs $18.6M, roughly 1.5× ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC). ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — -64.1% vs -120.8%, a 56.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -10.5%). ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.8M vs $-31.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Rumble Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.2% CAGR vs 4.5%).
Enanta Pharmaceuticals Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops innovative antiviral therapies for infectious diseases including hepatitis B virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and SARS-CoV-2. It operates primarily in the U.S. and global markets, partnering with pharmaceutical firms to advance its small molecule drug candidate pipeline for patients with unmet medical needs.
Rumble is a Canadian-American online video platform, web hosting, and cloud services business headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with its U.S. headquarters in Longboat Key, Florida. It was founded in 2013 by Chris Pavlovski, a Canadian technology entrepreneur. Rumble's cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American conservative and far-right users. Rumble has been described as "alt-tech".
ENTA vs RUM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.6M | $27.1M |
| Net Profit | $-11.9M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | -131.1% |
| Net Margin | -64.1% | -120.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.4% | 86.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.42 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.7M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.3M | $-236.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.8M | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.7M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.2M | $-43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.5% |
| Q4 25 | -60.5% | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -121.6% | -113.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -103.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.3% | -153.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -138.8% | -80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -204.4% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -134.6% | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -192.1% | -197.4% |
| Q4 25 | -64.1% | -120.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -123.6% | -65.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -99.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -151.7% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -131.4% | -783.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -197.3% | -125.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -126.1% | -119.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -182.7% | -244.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.42 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.88 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.85 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.06 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.05 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.36 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.4M | $237.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $126.6M | $274.8M |
| Total Assets | $329.5M | $336.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.4M | $237.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.2M | $301.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.3M | $114.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.8M | $154.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.5M | $183.8M |
| Q4 25 | $126.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.7M | $302.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.5M | $339.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.8M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | $166.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.9M | $192.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.1M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | $329.5M | $336.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.7M | $367.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $301.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $323.0M | $391.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.6M | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $376.7M | $217.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.8M | $243.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.6M | $263.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.7M | $-29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.8M | $-31.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -63.6% | -117.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 8.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-18.5M | $-70.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.7M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.8M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.6M | $-33.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.8M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.4M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.3M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.3M | $-34.3M |
| Q4 25 | -63.6% | -117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.5% | -48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.4% | -61.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -150.6% | -40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -132.5% | -79.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -118.6% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -177.5% | -193.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | 2.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENTA
Segment breakdown not available.
RUM
| Audience Monetization | $23.8M | 88% |
| Other Initiatives | $3.3M | 12% |
