vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enovix Corp (ENVX) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $11.3M, roughly 1.3× Enovix Corp). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -310.6%, a 348.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enovix Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -1.5%). SuperCom Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.6M vs $-28.0M).
Enovix Corp is an advanced battery technology company that designs, develops and manufactures high-energy-density 3D silicon anode lithium-ion batteries. Its products serve consumer electronics, wearable devices, electric vehicles, and renewable energy storage segments, with customers and operations across North America, Asia and Europe.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
ENVX vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.3M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-35.0M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -390.5% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -310.6% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.6% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.14 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-37.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-115.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -390.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -587.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -834.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -355.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1141.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2355.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1330.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -310.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -672.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -596.3% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -461.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -385.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -522.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3075.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -879.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.63 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $519.5M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $271.2M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $879.0M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.92× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $512.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $558.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $248.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $249.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $519.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $518.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $271.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.7M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $235.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $229.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $879.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $913.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $499.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $527.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $448.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $489.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $508.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-27.0M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-28.0M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -248.6% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-113.5M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.9M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-52.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -248.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -356.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -453.0% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -454.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -332.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1163.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1384.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -950.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 106.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 123.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 168.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 452.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 669.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 286.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
