vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.1M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.4× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Evolus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -14.6% vs -106.3%, a 91.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evolus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetics company focused on developing and commercializing non-surgical cosmetic treatment solutions. Its flagship product is a prescription neuromodulator designed to reduce moderate to severe glabellar frown lines, serving licensed aesthetic healthcare providers and consumers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific regional markets.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
EOLS vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.1M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-10.7M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 66.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -14.6% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $73.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.4M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $48.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.7M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.1M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.8M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.2M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.3M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.7% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | -14.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.8% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.6% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.4% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $156.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $220.6M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $146.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.5M | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.8M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.7M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.6M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $475.2M |
| Q1 26 | $220.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $225.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.8M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.00× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 98.67× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EOLS
| Product revenue, net | $72.7M | 99% |
| Service revenue | $390.0K | 1% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
