vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $30.5M, roughly 1.9× FGI Industries Ltd.). FGI Industries Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -8.6% vs -207.7%, a 199.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs -14.4%). FGI Industries Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3M vs $-75.2M).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
FGI Industries Ltd is a global designer, manufacturer and distributor of kitchen and bath products, home organization solutions, and home improvement goods. It serves major retail chains, home specialty stores and e-commerce platforms across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
EOSE vs FGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $30.5M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | 26.7% |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | -8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | -14.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | -553.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $-1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $33.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $35.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $-629.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $-402.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-550.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $163.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-412.2K |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.4% |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $-0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $17.3M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $69.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $73.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $68.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $68.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | $2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | $-212.5K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $617.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-915.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $862.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $-214.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $281.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.0% |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EOSE
Segment breakdown not available.
FGI
| Sanitaryware | $19.1M | 63% |
| Shower System | $5.8M | 19% |
| Kitchen And Bath Other | $3.3M | 11% |
| Bath Furniture Products | $2.3M | 7% |
