vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $58.0M, roughly 1.3× Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.). On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 27.7%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-75.2M).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
EOSE vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
