vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $58.0M, roughly 1.1× Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs -207.7%, a 239.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 30.8%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $-75.2M).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
EOSE vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
