vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.8× SCANSOURCE, INC.). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 2.2%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 2.5%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 0.9%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
EPAM vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
