vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and TKO Group Holdings (TKO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.4× TKO Group Holdings). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -0.2%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TKO Group Holdings posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 12.8%). Over the past eight quarters, TKO Group Holdings's revenue compounded faster (28.4% CAGR vs 9.9%).

EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is an American sports and sports entertainment company. Established on September 12, 2023, the public company was formed by a merger between Endeavor subsidiary Zuffa—the parent company of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), a mixed martial arts promotion—and the professional wrestling promotion World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).

EPAM vs TKO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EPAM
EPAM
1.4× larger
EPAM
$1.4B
$1.0B
TKO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TKO
TKO
+48.9% gap
TKO
61.6%
12.8%
EPAM
Higher net margin
EPAM
EPAM
8.0% more per $
EPAM
7.8%
-0.2%
TKO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TKO
TKO
Annualised
TKO
28.4%
9.9%
EPAM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.0B
Net Profit
$109.4M
$-2.4M
Gross Margin
30.1%
Operating Margin
10.6%
5.5%
Net Margin
7.8%
-0.2%
Revenue YoY
12.8%
61.6%
Net Profit YoY
5.9%
-107.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.97
$-0.07

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$642.2M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$681.3M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$851.2M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$629.7M
Net Profit
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$109.4M
$-2.4M
Q3 25
$106.8M
$41.0M
Q2 25
$88.0M
$98.4M
Q1 25
$73.5M
$58.4M
Q4 24
$103.3M
$31.0M
Q3 24
$136.3M
$23.1M
Q2 24
$98.6M
$59.1M
Q1 24
$116.2M
$-103.8M
Gross Margin
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
30.1%
Q3 25
29.5%
Q2 25
28.8%
Q1 25
26.9%
Q4 24
30.4%
Q3 24
34.6%
Q2 24
29.3%
Q1 24
28.4%
Operating Margin
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
10.6%
5.5%
Q3 25
10.4%
15.4%
Q2 25
9.3%
28.1%
Q1 25
7.6%
18.7%
Q4 24
10.9%
15.9%
Q3 24
15.2%
20.0%
Q2 24
10.5%
30.0%
Q1 24
9.5%
-33.4%
Net Margin
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
7.8%
-0.2%
Q3 25
7.7%
3.7%
Q2 25
6.5%
7.5%
Q1 25
5.6%
4.6%
Q4 24
8.3%
4.8%
Q3 24
11.7%
3.4%
Q2 24
8.6%
6.9%
Q1 24
10.0%
-16.5%
EPS (diluted)
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$1.97
$-0.07
Q3 25
$1.91
$0.47
Q2 25
$1.56
$1.17
Q1 25
$1.28
$0.69
Q4 24
$1.80
$0.28
Q3 24
$2.37
$0.28
Q2 24
$1.70
$0.72
Q1 24
$1.97
$-1.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.3B
$831.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.7B
$3.7B
Total Assets
$4.9B
$15.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$1.3B
$831.1M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$861.4M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$535.1M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$470.9M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$525.6M
Q3 24
$2.1B
$457.4M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$277.5M
Q1 24
$2.0B
$245.8M
Total Debt
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$3.8B
Q3 25
$3.7B
Q2 25
$2.7B
Q1 25
$2.8B
Q4 24
$2.8B
Q3 24
$2.7B
Q2 24
$2.7B
Q1 24
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$3.7B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$3.7B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$4.3B
Q1 25
$3.6B
$4.2B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$4.1B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$4.0B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$4.0B
Total Assets
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$4.9B
$15.5B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$15.5B
Q2 25
$4.7B
$15.3B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$15.0B
Q4 24
$4.8B
$12.7B
Q3 24
$4.5B
$12.8B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$12.7B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$12.7B
Debt / Equity
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
1.01×
Q3 25
0.98×
Q2 25
0.64×
Q1 25
0.66×
Q4 24
0.67×
Q3 24
0.67×
Q2 24
0.68×
Q1 24
0.68×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$282.9M
$309.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$268.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
19.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.59×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$612.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$282.9M
$309.9M
Q3 25
$294.7M
$416.8M
Q2 25
$53.2M
$396.2M
Q1 25
$24.2M
$162.8M
Q4 24
$130.3M
$56.8M
Q3 24
$242.0M
$236.5M
Q2 24
$57.0M
$230.7M
Q1 24
$129.9M
$59.3M
Free Cash Flow
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
$268.1M
Q3 25
$286.4M
Q2 25
$43.4M
Q1 25
$14.8M
Q4 24
$114.5M
Q3 24
$237.0M
Q2 24
$52.3M
Q1 24
$123.2M
FCF Margin
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
19.0%
Q3 25
20.5%
Q2 25
3.2%
Q1 25
1.1%
Q4 24
9.2%
Q3 24
20.3%
Q2 24
4.6%
Q1 24
10.6%
Capex Intensity
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
1.1%
Q3 25
0.6%
Q2 25
0.7%
Q1 25
0.7%
Q4 24
1.3%
Q3 24
0.4%
Q2 24
0.4%
Q1 24
0.6%
Cash Conversion
EPAM
EPAM
TKO
TKO
Q4 25
2.59×
Q3 25
2.76×
10.16×
Q2 25
0.60×
4.03×
Q1 25
0.33×
2.79×
Q4 24
1.26×
1.83×
Q3 24
1.77×
10.22×
Q2 24
0.58×
3.90×
Q1 24
1.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EPAM
EPAM

Segment breakdown not available.

TKO
TKO

World Wrestling Entertainment Segment$359.6M35%
IMG Segment$247.6M24%
Media Rights Production And Content$222.6M21%
Partnerships And Marketing$93.3M9%
Live Events And Hospitality$72.2M7%
Other$29.4M3%
Consumer Products Licensing And Other$13.2M1%

Related Comparisons