vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HARTE HANKS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.9M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.9× EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP). HARTE HANKS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 5.2%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -15.4%). Over the past eight quarters, EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP's revenue compounded faster (-5.2% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
EPM vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.7M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 158.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $824.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.0K | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8M | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.5M | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $169.3M | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.0K | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $169.3M | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.3M | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.4M | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.2M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.9M | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.9M | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.5M | $113.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.09× | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.09× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.69× | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
