vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.7M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.5× Laird Superfood, Inc.). EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -13.2%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -5.2%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
EPM vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.7M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 158.4% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $824.0K | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.5M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $169.3M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $169.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.4M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.5M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
