vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM) and Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.8M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.8× EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP). EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 0.1%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs 2.0%).
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
EPM vs NP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.7M | $37.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $50.0K |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 158.4% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $824.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $169.3M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.0K | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.1M | $-509.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $-374.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.47× | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |
NP
Segment breakdown not available.
