vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. (EPRT) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $158.8M, roughly 1.5× ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.). ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs 10.6%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (20.6% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Essential Properties Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net-leased commercial properties across the United States. Its assets primarily cover essential service-oriented sectors including casual dining, automotive services, medical clinics, early childhood education centers and light industrial facilities, with tenants mostly holding robust long-term operating track records.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
EPRT vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.8M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $60.0M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 56.5% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 37.8% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.5% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $158.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.9M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.9M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.1M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.4M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.7M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.3M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.4M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.1% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.1% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.2M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.2M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.0M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.7M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.60× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $381.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.8M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.60× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.57× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPRT
| Rental revenue 1,2 | $149.4M | 94% |
| Other | $8.6M | 5% |
| Other revenue | $779.0K | 0% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
