vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EQUITY BANCSHARES INC (EQBK) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.6× EQUITY BANCSHARES INC). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs -7.0%, a 41.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs 14.5%). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.1M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
EQBK vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $22.1M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.7% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 34.8% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.4% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.4M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.3M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.3M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.9M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.7M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -207.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -164.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.55 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.06 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.28 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $443.2M | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $732.1M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.4B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $443.2M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $486.9M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.4M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $376.9M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.8M | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.5M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $391.7M | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $367.1M | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $732.1M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.6M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $617.3M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.9M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $504.0M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $461.4M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $456.8M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $51.4M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.1M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 60.0% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.9% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $88.8M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.5M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $38.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.4M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 112.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.0% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.90× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EQBK
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
